Pages

Contributors

My professional profile on Linkedin

View James Alexander's profile on LinkedIn

Where my visitors are

A380's TRENT XWB

Materials Science and Engineering, Durable Development, Recycling..

Custom Search

Blog List-Free Science and Engineering Information Resources cf also Side and Bottom menu bars

Scientific Reports - nature.com science feeds

Physical sciences : nature.com subject feeds

Materials science : nature.com subject feeds

Sunday, 11 September 2011

Foresight-Hindsight in Materials Science and Engineering _Project Portfolio Management

Following my last post “ Selection Criteria for Research Project Funding,” 8 Sept. 2011, let us continue our “Foresight –Hindsight” (marketing) exercise using a short presentation using a modified BCG matrix (4 squares)or  GE/McKinsey matrix(9 squares) chart

The chart which I wish to draw to the attention of my metallurgical and materials scientist friends,  members of  The Institute was originally published in Materials World    and archived in my personal files for more than a decade.  Cf. Image 1 below.   It is a nine square GE/McKinsey matrix.

-Areas of Attractiveness are represented by 3 colums- (vertical axis):  1. Emerging,2. Intermediate and 3. Key priority areas, of increasing attractiveness 1 to 3.
-Areas of Feasibility are represented by position on the horizontal axis :  increasing feasibility from left to right.
Within this matrix the upper most right hand square is magnified and again divided into another 9 square matrix, “Attractiveness versus Feasibility”.  Such a process both shows how this approach can be usefully refined while pragmatically bringing focus to the necessary couple, Key Priorities which are Feasible.  Clear objectives can be given and so motivation increased.  The challenges of the research for excellence are respected and the likelihood of impact in appropriate areas increased.
The presentation allows the representation of 9 blocks IE GE/McKinsey presentation.
The arc through the intermediate and emerging  themes draws attention to the fact that the most-attractive and desireable does not always correspond to the most feasible.
Many of the themes presented in the previous post "Selection Criteria for Research Funding" EPSRC 2010 - 2013 have previously figured in the BCG - GE/McKinsey Matrix approach established at least a decade earlier (Image 1) An attempt to show this continuing preoccupation with certain themes is shown in the table below in bold characters. One reason for this is the wide nature of themes cf previous post headings:

THREE WIDE FOCUS THEMES TO IMPACT UPON.
THREE STRATEGIC GOALS.
SIX GLOBAL RESEARCH CHALLENGES to be ADDRESSED

<><><>  <><><><>   <>

KEY
PRIORITY AREAS
Health & Life Style
Optical Tech.
Genetic &
Biomolecular Eng.,
Bioinformatics, Communication
with machines, Telerepresentation/
multimedia,
Sensors &
sensory information processing,
Software Eng.,
Security &
privacy tech

INTER-
MEDIATE
AREAS
Risk assessment
& management,
Design & Systems Integration,
Chemical &
Biological
Synthesis,



Information
Management,
Modelling &
Simulation, Catalysis,
Work place
& Home.
 Management &
Business                                    Process Eng.,
  Environmentally     sustainable tech.
EMERGING
AREAS
Demographic change, clean processing tech, Energy Tech, LCA,  Automation.

Biomaterials,
Materials Process
& Control,
Materials processing
tech.
                                 Feasibility---------------------->



RELATED POSTS
1. Selection Criteria for Research Project Funding 8 Sept. 20112..
2.Critical Minerals and Metals Defined  12 April 2011.

REFERENCES – EBOOKS on Forsight and Portfolio Management

1.      GE/McKinsey matrix(9 squares) chart
2. Portfolio Management: Fundamental for New Product Success  [pdf]
by Dr. Robert G. Cooper, Dr. Scott J. Edgett and Dr. Elko J. Kleinschmidt,
Reference Paper #12
Compliments of: Stage-Gate International and Product Development Institute Inc
4. Foresight Projects are in-depth studies examining major issues 20-80 years in the future.
5. Selection of research priorities – method of critical technologies by Karel Klusacek [pdf]
Technology Centre of the Academy of Sciences CR Rozvojova 135, 165 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic
6. Crafting a methodology for formation of R and D strategy based on evolutionary epistemology: case study of Iran power industry [pdf]

7. Priority Systems: Technical Terms Used in Project Portfolio Management

9. Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques, John M. Bryson, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, 245 Humphrey Center, University of Minnesota [pdf].

NB WARNING TO THE R&D Communities

No comments:

High Purity Cr sources for Superalloys

Energy for th Future:Phil.Trans.A-Vol. 365, N° 1853 / April 15, 2007, curtesy The Royal Soc. London

Engineered foams and porous materials: Phil Trans A. Vol 364, N° 1838 / 06 curtesy_The R Soc. Lond